o How would your understanding and opinions of
this article change if you knew it was written by a college professor of 20
years?
this article change if you knew it was written by a college professor of 20
years?
I think i would believe it more because he was a college professor of 20 years and he would know what he was talking about.
o How would your understanding and opinions of this
article change if you knew it was written by a high school senior for a history
class?
article change if you knew it was written by a high school senior for a history
class?
I do not think i would believe it like i would if the professor wrote it.
The writer's purpose
- yes he states the purpose He wants you to know that people deserve a higher education
- to encourage action
- she is logic
- i do not see a preconceptions about the subject
the writers audience
- anyone that would want to go to college
- neutral
- the audiences holds a lot because the author would like to see everyone go to college
- uninformed
the topic
- higher education
- to help people want a higher education
- yes i understood this
the context
- is to go to college
- that college is not for people that do not have a lot of money
- that college was only for the men out of WWII and people who had money
o What appeal(s) did the author use? How do you know?
talked about the difference between today and the 20th century in colleges.
No comments:
Post a Comment